총포ㆍ도검ㆍ화약류등의안전관리에관한법률위반등
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.
No. 1, 2, and 4 of the total list of seized articles shall be confiscated.
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable because the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable.
B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too uneasible and unreasonable.
The evidence No. 4 is subject to forfeiture, not the evidence No. 3 of the total list of seized articles.
2. Determination
A. As to both of the allegations of unfair sentencing, the Defendant appears to have expressed violent inclinations, such as assaulting the victim, etc., from time to time during the marriage life with the victim, who is suspected that the victim was imprisoned. Even after the victim was divorced from the victim, the victim was snicked with another male and sent the Defendant, and the victim’s “hacking down” shall be discarded.
“.....” and “........, they could feel the tearing pain.”
Shesing to a saw shall be discarded.
“Along with the victim’s expression as if he/she had intended to inflict harm on the victim, the victim was sent with F’s help, acquired an electronic shock machine without permission, and used his/her child to find out the rest of his/her life while moving to the Defendant, and the victim was found to have attempted to conceal him/her through the operator of the center.
In addition, until the victim was found in the studio parking lot in which the victim is living, the victim was able to return home and the victim was able to get the neck of the victim and get the stude on the vehicle prepared for the electronic shock machine.
On May 5, 2020, prior to each of the instant crimes, the Defendant: (a) found the victim’s residence where restrictions were imposed on the perusal of the resident registration; (b) led the victim; (c) was removed by the discovered child; and (d) committed assault to achieve his/her purpose, such as having blicked the blicker and laid the stone, which is a dangerous and dangerous object, and (e) committed assault to F.g., the victim with an electronic shock.
“The term “” was also referred to.
No. 205 of the evidence record No. 205, although the defendant's arrest was committed against attempted crimes, each of the crimes of this case.