However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 22, 2014, at the Seoul High Court located in Seocho-gu Seoul High Court located in Seocho-gu Seoul High Court, the Defendant appeared as an appraiser in the lawsuit claiming the return of the purchase price between the Plaintiff Samp Business Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Seoul High Court”) and the Defendant D’s appraiser in the lawsuit claiming the return of the purchase price.

On December 19, 2014, from around January 18, 2015 to around January 18, 2015, the Defendant appraised as to whether the processing costs, including the air quarantine for automobile parts supplied by the Defendant to the Plaintiff in relation to the instant case, are appropriate. On February 3, 2015, the Defendant submitted an appraisal to the effect that “round February 3, 2015, the total processing costs, including the air quarantine for 10 vehicles parts supplied by the Defendant to the Plaintiff, are KRW 714,302,945, and the total processing costs, including the air quarantine for 931,937 vehicles parts supplied by the Defendant to the Plaintiff, are KRW 79,076,352, which deducts the costs of scrap scrap from the total scrap processing costs, are 635,226,593 won.”

Examining the contents of the above appraisal report, in order to calculate the fee for processing, the Defendant visited the Defendant’s factory to check the actual process of manufacturing and measured the process of manufacturing at the Defendant’s factory.

In order to reflect the preparation time required for each part's work preparation and a marking of gold, etc. as an important factor in the calculation of the total processing cost, a video which measured the preparation time for the correction of a gold-type attachment on the basis of the calculation of the above preparation period was attached based on the video, and a gold-type maintenance fee is included in the total processing cost on the ground that the gold-type has deteriorated.

However, in fact, the Defendant measured the process of the pressing manufacturing process and the preparation period of another product that is not the object of appraisal by using a gold type other than a gold type used for the manufacture of the above automobile parts. Nevertheless, as if the press manufacturing process of the automobile parts which are the object of appraisal was measured, the one-day wave of each video attached to the above appraisal statement is the object of appraisal of this case.