However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Part of pharmacy opening shall be prohibited from opening any pharmacy other than a pharmacist who violates the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, who is not a pharmacist, has employed B as a pharmacist, prepared an application for the establishment of a real estate contract and a pharmacy in the name of B, and registered B’s bank account as a business operator, and B agreed to receive a certain amount of money from the Defendant as the price for the above act and the employee pharmacist, and the Defendant actually established and operated the pharmacy, but, as if B established and operated the pharmacy, conspired to establish the appearance of the Defendant, who is not a pharmacist.

The Defendant and B, according to the aforementioned public offering from January 24, 2015 to March 27, 2015, concluded that B shall pay 3 million won per month for the use of a pharmacist’s name, preparation of medicine, etc., and that B shall be employed as a pharmacist of the above pharmacy. The above pharmacy shall be equipped with the pharmacy’s facilities, such as a dispensary, sales of medicine, etc., and the above pharmacy shall be in charge of the overall operation of the pharmacy; B shall prepare the real estate agreement and the application for the establishment of a pharmacy in his/her own name; and B opened and operated the above pharmacy in a way that the Defendant opened a bank account in his/her name and opened the said pharmacy.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with B to establish a pharmacy in violation of the prohibition of establishing a pharmacy by a person other than a pharmacist.

2. No person other than a pharmacist who violates the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act shall prepare medicines for the portion of sales of unqualified medicines, and no person other than a pharmacy founder shall sell medicines;

Nevertheless, around 14:43 on April 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) as his assistant, sold prepared drugs in 25,000, which correspond to 7 minutes to F, who appealed from the above D’s pharmacy to the above D’s license.

As a result, the Defendant sold medicines to a person other than a pharmacy founder.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The defendant, E.