beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.07.06 2016고단926

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On May 12, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court, and was released on November 30, 201 from the Incheon Prison on parole on the execution of the sentence, and the parole period expired on December 24, 201.

[Criminal facts]

1. On July 6, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around July 6, 2014, entered the victim B with a large amount of money, prior to the cash withdrawal period for a new bank in Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, Yeonsu-dong, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, for a 59 BYC building; (b) “I see that I would like to place an officetel to a male-child-gu office.”

A loan of KRW 10 million shall be made with the interest of KRW 4,00,000 and after one month.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, the defendant thought that he will receive money from the injured party and did not have a plan to purchase an officetel, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have an intention or ability to repay it.

As can be seen, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was given KRW 6 million in cash from the victim, that is, the victim, and was remitted KRW 4 million to the account in the name of C on July 7, 2014.

2. The Defendant’s fraud on September 12, 2014: (a) around September 12, 2014; (b) around September 12, 2014, the Plaintiff: (c) around Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Building D (1) 701; and (d) the victim “it is urgently necessary for real estate-friendly Gus

If the internal government has lent 20 million won in trust on the test date of responsibility and has lent 20 million won to the relative, it will be lent to the relative and repaid 20 million won after the second day of the 4th interest.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, the defendant did not have a plan to lend money to the real estate-friendly relationship, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to repay the money.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 17.5 million from the victim’s account under C on September 12, 2014, and KRW 2.5 million from the account under C on September 13, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to B;

1. Copy of each passbook and details of financial transactions;