On September 16, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 00:39 on September 16, 2015, while driving the vehicle at the speed of 00:00,000, the two-lane crossings in front of KT in the luminous white road was driven from the length of the container wharf at a speed that would not be known along the two-lanes from the 3-lane to the west of the luminous city.

At this time, since the signal, etc. has been normally operated at the time, the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive the signal in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front side of a car driving by the Defendant, which was driven by the victim C, which was driven by the victim C at the right side of the moving direction by negligence in violation of the signal.

As a result, the Defendant suffered multiple ties and injuries that require approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim C by negligence in the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

Article 3(1) and the proviso of Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, which shall apply to the criminal facts subject to the Act and subordinate statutes of the Defendant’s legal statement C’s report on the occurrence of traffic accidents, the statement of traffic accident occurrence, the statement of traffic accident evidence, the diagnosis document, and the criminal facts subject to the Act and subordinate statutes; Article 268 of the Criminal Act; Article 70 and Article 69(2)(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the suspended sentence of a fine of KRW 70,000,000 (10,000,000 won per day) of the suspended sentence of Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (the suspended sentence shall be imposed in consideration of the fact that the Defendant’s mistake is against the Defendant; the primary fact that the Defendant was subscribed to a comprehensive mutual aid agreement of the victim; the extent of injury to the victim; the Defendant’s consent was agreed by the victim and the victim; the Defendant’s age