도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant is divided into his mistake, and that the defendant has a family member to support the defendant.
However, considering the fact that the nature of the crime of this case is not good, that the blood alcohol concentration is high, that the defendant again commits the crime of this case during the suspension period for the same kind of crime even though he had a previous record at several times, the balance of sentencing with the same crime, the defendant's age, character and conduct and environment, motive, means and result of the crime, etc., and other conditions of sentencing specified in the pleadings of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.