[B] On October 7, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for robbery by the Gwangju District Court, and completed the execution of the said sentence on October 2, 2015.

[2] On April 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 15:35, 2017, around the Seo-gu 105, Seo-gu 105, Seo-gu, Gwangju, a judicial police officer belonging to the Seo-gu Police Station AT District, who was under the control of the drinking citizens upon receiving a report of 112 before the third elevator of the 105, Seo-gu 105, and was under the control of the police officer of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu Police Station AT District. The Defendant should grow up with the same mos

Professor He inevitably expressed his desire to do so, and assaulted on the face of the above AU, such as spitation.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against AU;

1. Previous relationship: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and the current status of personal expropriation;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes [Scope of Recommendation] There is no person [the person who has been subject to special sentencing] in the basic area of Category 1 (Interference with and Compelling of Duties) [6 months to one year and six months] [Judgment of sentencing] during the period of repeated crimes; the crime is committed during the period of repeated crimes; the crime is unsatisfy, and the crime is committed in depth due to poor contents of the crime; the previous case (No. 2790 in this Court) is pending; the prior case (No. 2017No. 2790 in this Court); and other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the conditions for the sentencing specified in the argument of the instant case, a sentence exceeding the lower limit of