When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 12, 2014, at around 21:00, the Defendant argued that the victim F (59 years of age) was forced to be reinstated in the party conference room located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Kim Chang-gun on the ground that “this is big? These things must be paid only once a confusion is.” The Defendant used the victim’s flabbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbs on the left side of the victim who was seated, and used the victim’s flaps once with the left hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness F and H (the statement of the witness F in the investigative agency and the court are specific and consistent and high credibility, and the witness H’s statement also conforms to this. It is natural to view that the defendant is related to the defendant’s assault, such as the circumstance that I would end up his dispute up to F and the situation that I moved to the F side where I would like to end his dispute, or that H moved to another position by the defendant, etc. It is natural to view that the defendant is also related to the defendant’s assault. The defendant’s assertion that the defendant did not assault the victim is not accepted) applies to the law

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The main sentence of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;