On April 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 00:00, around 105 Dong 1002, the Defendant demanded that the victim communicateed with his/her father and Kakaoo Stockholm, and present his/her cell phone to the victim, and had the victim look at his/her cell phone.

The Defendant, in the victim’s Kakao Stockholm list, reported out of the victim’s conversation with other male and female in addition to his/her father, asked the victim to see the message, but requested the victim to continue to show the message.

The defendant continued to refuse the victim's cell phone, forced the victim's cell phone who did not show the mobile phone, and assaulted the victim's chest by force and blue the victim's hand to return it 2 to 3 times, affixing a seal on 2 to 2, and cutting down the victim's chest.

2. The judgment is a crime subject to Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the same Act. Since on August 16, 2018, which was subsequent to the filing of the summary order of this case (the date of August 4, 2018), the injured party expressed his/her intention not to be punished against the defendant, it can be recognized to the court. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.