제3자이의
1. An authentic copy of the Incheon District Court 2015 Ghana9390 Decision on Performance Recommendation (Defendant B Company).
The fact that the Defendant, on April 20, 2016, executed a compulsory execution under the Incheon District Court 2016No2575 on the corporeal movables listed in the separate sheet as the executive title of the Incheon District Court 2015Gaso9390 for B (hereinafter referred to as “foreign company”) (hereinafter referred to as “instant movable property”) with respect to the corporeal movables as indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as “instant movable property”), and there is no dispute between the parties to the instant compulsory execution.
The plaintiff asserts that compulsory execution against the movable property of this case, one's own, should be denied.
In light of the purport of the whole arguments and arguments as to Gap's testimony and Eul's testimony, it is recognized that the plaintiff purchased the movable property of this case, the office fixtures, around 2006, in order to conduct a partnership with Eul, but did not participate in the partnership with Eul, and thereafter leased the said movable property to Eul, and that the non-party company succeeded to the lessee's status while establishing the non-party company with Eul.
Thus, the plaintiff, the owner of the movable property of this case, can seek the exclusion of compulsory execution of this case, thereby admitting the plaintiff's claim of this case.