If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On April 4, 2017, at around 21:25, the Defendant: (a) parked in the city of Busan, in front of the F church; (b) when the victim B and the city expenses were parked in front of the F church, Defendant assaulted the victim by spiting the victim on one occasion on the face of the victim.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as above, spits A spits spits spits spits the victim’s face on the victim’s face, and assaulted the victim by spits spits spits.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Defendant A and his defense counsel asserted that there was no act described in the facts charged, but it is sufficient to find the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case in full view of the evidence presented in the summary of the evidence above. Thus, the above assertion is without merit.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;