2. It is recognized that the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and against his mistake, and that the Defendant’s benefits are relatively large, and that the instant crime could have been tried together with the crime of interference with business, etc. for which the judgment became final and conclusive.

However, even if the Defendant had had been punished several times prior to the instant crime, he/she again committed the instant crime, and the lower court, taking into account the following circumstances favorable to the Defendant, imposed a fine of KRW 500,000,00, which has already been mitigated compared to the summary order, taking into account the Defendant’s age, environment, family relationship, occupation, circumstances surrounding the instant crime, and circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.