양수금
1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff 147,53,854 won and 42,312,628 won among them to the day of complete payment.
In full view of the respective descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (including the provisional number) and the overall purport of the pleadings, it is recognized that the same cause of the claim is recognized as the fact of claim as indicated in the attached Table (the "creditor" shall be deemed to be the "Plaintiff," and the "debtor" shall be deemed to be the "Defendant," and the defendant is liable to pay the unpaid principal and interest
The defendant asserts to the effect that "the extinctive prescription for each claim of this case has expired", but according to each of the above evidence, the ground for the claim in attached Form
2. It can be known that the lawsuit in this case was filed before the lapse of 10 years from the date of the final transaction in the case of a claim Nos. 1 and 2, classified as the "statement of claim details". Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
If so, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable and acceptable.