2. The judgment of the court below is taking into account the fact that the defendant led the confession, was in depth of his mistake, the defendant's difficult family style, etc. However, in this case, the defendant provided two parts of the E and F private-use truck (5 tons loaded on his own name) for commercial transport, and the violation is not less and less severe, the defendant had been punished by a fine as being provided for commercial transport, and the defendant committed the crime of this case for no longer than long time, and all of the sentencing conditions, such as punishment cases in similar cases, cannot be deemed as having been imposed by the court below.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.