On March 2, 2011, the Defendant: (a) had an interview with a nurse at a meeting of the E members of the victim D, which was operated by the victim D, of the Kimhae-si Building 401, and had an interview with the nurse at the settlement of the inspection expenses; (b) had a large amount of shocks from 15:00 to 17:00 on the same day; (c) had a shock shocks at the meeting of the nurse; (d) had a shocks at the meeting of the nurse; and (e) had a shocks at the meeting of the nurse from 15:00 to 17:00 on the same day; and (e) had a shocked the shocks at the meeting of the nurse; and (e) had interfered with the duties of the hospital of the victim by force

(A) In light of the fact that the Defendant’s statement during the fifth trial corresponds to the victim’s statement, the above facts constituting the crime are recognized. The gist of the evidence is as follows.

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

2. Legal statement of witness D;

3. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment to Materials A), requests for reference expenses, and receipt of documents;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

2. A fine of 700,000 won to be suspended;

3. Articles 70 and 69 (1) of the Criminal Act (the conversion of KRW 50,000 per day) of the Criminal Act into a workhouse.

4. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons above Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da11448, Apr.