2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The land division and registration relationship (1) was owned by the Korea Development Institute of Hanyang, the original Defendant educational foundation. However, from August 14, 1969, the Defendant educational foundation, from around August 14, 1969, issued a share transfer registration to each purchaser of the instant land before subdivision.

(2) On July 20, 1974, Nonparty L completed the registration of ownership transfer on the 632/57897 shares of the land before the instant partition.

(3) On November 10, 1976, the land before the instant subdivision was divided into 96 pieces of land, such as 584 square meters, and 584 square meters (hereinafter “divided land”) due to farmland improvement. The entry in the registry of the land before the instant subdivision was transferred to the registry of each divided land, and the said N-Pure 632 square meters was also one of the divided land.

(4) On January 12, 1994, the Plaintiff received the registration of ownership transfer for the portion of 632/57897 of land within 96 parcels divided from L prior to the instant subdivision from L.

(5) The land later divided was the land of Pyeongtaek-si due to the change of administrative district and lot number on March 13, 1995. The land was the land substitution due to the completion of the arable rearrangement project, such as the agricultural foundation on July 16, 1996, and part of the substituted land is the land indicated in the annexed sheet (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. (1) The Defendant C filed a lawsuit seeking the registration of transfer of ownership based on the cancellation of mutual title trust against 85 persons, including the Plaintiffs, etc., who owned co-ownership shares on eight parcels of land, including the instant land divided from the land before subdivision, as the court 201Gahap643.

(2) On February 5, 2015, the aforementioned court rendered a judgment of admitting a claim against the party who did not dispute including the Plaintiffs by confession or deemed confession. The remaining claims against the disputing parties are dismissed on the grounds that there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge a mutual title trust relationship.