However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

1. Larceny;

A. At around 10:10 on July 23, 2015, the Defendant entered the first floor of the new loan site in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, and stolen the victim D with one cell phone per 700,000 won of the market price and one credit card per national bank (E) within the bank attached to the victim D while performing the construction work.

B. At around 07:10 on August 9, 2015, the Defendant cited and stolen the victim H, the victim I, the victim I, and the victim JJ from a mobile phone on the side of the mobile phone, one mobile phone owned by the victim H, the market value of which is equivalent to KRW 300,000,000 of the victim H, the victim I, one mobile phone owned by the victim I, one mobile phone of KRW 61,000,000,000, and one mobile phone of KRW 890,000,000,000,000, the victim J, and one mobile phone of KRW 8,000,00,000.

C. On September 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 05:18, 2015, in the “Lina” located in K in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant cited one cell phone of the victim’s 800,000 won at the victim’s market price, which is the victim’s possession, and stolen the victim’s cell phone.

2. Fraud and violation of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act;

A. On July 23, 2015, the Defendant, at the “P” convenience store for the victim’s O in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government N, purchased one cigarette equivalent to the market value of KRW 4,500, and paid 4,500 for tobacco price by presenting the stolen credit card completion to the above store as if the credit card was owned by the Defendant, as set forth in paragraph 1(a), to the store occupant, as if the credit card was owned by the Defendant.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the above point of view, obtained the above tobacco and acquired it, and used the stolen credit card.

B. On July 23, 2015, at the “S” store operated by the victim R in the first floor of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Qu building, the Defendant purchased 14 K K sales shop with the market value of KRW 8.10,000,000, and paid KRW 8.10,000,000 for the reason of the purchase to T by presenting the credit card completion under the name of D as if it was a credit card owned by the Defendant as if it was a credit card owned by the Defendant.

As such, the Defendant deceivings the above T.