Of the facts charged in the instant case, a public prosecution against defamation is instituted.

At around 16:50 on March 11, 2014, the Defendant demanded “C” located in the Dong-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-si, Seoul-si, that the victim D (the victim was 32 years of age and female) should keep the wind with the husband of the Defendant and prepare a letter of intent not to meet the Defendant’s husband, and the victim was found to be “whether the victim is unable to meet the victim’s head,” and the victim was found to have taken off the victim’s head head debt and flickly, so that the Defendant was faced with the victim’s eye and snow flurine, which requires treatment for 15 days in the number of times, the Defendant was faced with the victim’s eye and snow flurine, the flurine’s flurine and tension, the flurine’s salt and tension, the flurine’s sium damage, the flurine’s sium damage, the stalf, the sium damage, the flst.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police protocol of statement to D and E, and each police medical certificate of injury;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and fines;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (one-day conversion amount: 100,000 won);

1. The portion of rejection of prosecution under Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (the amount of fine to be suspended of sentence: 1,000,000 won, the circumstances to be taken into account for the commission of the crime, the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant under an agreement with the victim, and the primary offender who has no record of the crime) of the suspended sentence;

1. The Defendant injured the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out facts by assaulting the victim’s head debt at the date, time, and place indicated in the facts charged. In the situation where there is a person with a customer to find a store by assaulting the victim’s head debt, “whether it is good for his husband to meet with her husband within her husband, whether it is good for her husband with her home, whether she was divorced by her husband, and whether she is about to have been divorced by her male tag in the South and North Korea, and by sounding these years, her year, years, weather, and two years.”

2. The above facts charged constitute a crime falling under Article 307(1) of the Criminal Act, and under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act, a crime cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent. As such, the victim’s punishment against the Defendant on November 17, 2014 is sought.