However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 15:50 of 2016, the Defendant operated a Map Motor Vehicle B in the direction of the school in the direction of the Twitter from the intersection to the direction of the Twitter. On June 15:5, 2016, the Defendant threatened the victim by changing the vehicle rapidly in the future of the Defendant’s driving, after the victim C (55 years old) overtakened the above vehicle of the Defendant’s driving, and then rapidly changed the vehicle of the above vehicle of the Defendant’s driving. However, the Defendant overtaken the above vehicle of the victim’s driving, and then, by changing the vehicle of the victim’s driving, and making a sudden operation over three occasions.

In this respect, the defendant carried a dangerous object, and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to video recording CDs on the commission of crime;

1. Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Although there is a substantial risk of committing the crime for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, considering the fact that the victim has an aspect of inducing the crime by changing the level in the future of the defendant, and that the defendant is against