However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

No person who processes or has processed personal information of a user of information and communications services shall damage, infringe, or divulge personal information that he/she has become aware of in the course of performing his

From around 2010, the Defendant had been engaged in mobile phone sales and customer subscription service at a mobile phone agency. From April 201 to around 2015, the Defendant had been operating a mobile phone agency with the trade name of “D” and an Internet entrance center with “E” in the Gyeonggi Gyeong-si from around 2011 to around Haman, while managing the personal information of the subscribers, stored the personal information of the subscribers as a separate X-ray file and stored it in its USB.

On June 20, 2017, around 00:40, the Defendant revealed personal information that he/she came to know in the course of performing his/her duties, including personal information, such as the name, resident registration number, cell phone number, e-mail, address, etc., of H from the “G” room located in the Northern-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, and the name, resident registration number, cell phone number, and address of 118,693 as stated in the attached crime list.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect to J or H;

1. A list of seizure records (voluntary submission), and a list of seizure;

1. Each internal investigation report and each investigation report;

1. The application of each resident data inquiry letter, separate Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 71 (1) 5 and Article 28-2 (1) of the Act on Promotion of the Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, the punishment of imprisonment, and the choice of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The result was that personal information that was known in the course of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act was used as a target of transaction on the Internet market by thoroughly divulging it to another person.

In that such personal information is highly likely to be used as a means of other crimes, such as scam, etc., the defendant's crime is heavy.

(b).