2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On March 23, 2018, the Defendant sold five of the five stores within the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D apartment complex by bidding from the CHousing Redevelopment and Rearrangement Association.

B. On March 28, 2018, the Defendant: (a) distributed materials such as the Defendant’s employees G name cards, details of sales price calculation, floor plan, etc. to the Fdong Real Estate Agent Office 5-6 World Real Estate Agent Office, including the Plaintiff and E Real Estate; and (b) discovered the number of persons to purchase the said store.

C. On March 30, 2018, the Plaintiff requested G to purchase the said 3 and 4 stores (hereinafter “instant stores”) among the said 5 stores, and the Plaintiff requested the Plaintiff’s office to visit the Plaintiff, and discussed the sales contract of the instant store by gathering either licensed real estate agents I, H, and G working as the Plaintiff in the Plaintiff’s office at 7 p.m. on the same day.

G confirmed the terms and conditions of the sales contract as the Defendant’s office, and signed a sales contract, and all of them moved to the Defendant’s office. During that process, G would enter into a sales contract in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Defendant’s presented sale price and condition while the person who requested G to purchase E real estate, and the person who requested G to purchase E real estate would deposit part of the down payment amount of KRW 30,000,000 directly to the Defendant. G was paid KRW 30,000 on the side of E real estate by notifying the Defendant of the deposit account, and entered into a sales contract under the brokerage of E real estate on the following day.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 6, entry of Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2 and 4 (including additional numbers), witness H's witness H's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion

A. The primary assertion made with the Defendant a consulting agreement with the MM marketing method, that is, by attracting new customers through the existing customers, a contract with the broker (licensed real estate agent) to pay a certain fee. The Plaintiff’s primary assertion is the H and the Defendant’s store.