Provided, That the execution of the above punishment for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. At around 20:45 on December 27, 2014, Defendant A expressed the victim’s desire to fight with the victim on the ground that the victim B (the age of 58) was present at the EMVIP room located in Geum-gu, Busan, for the late time at the network of the EMA club, and expressed the victim’s desire to “Chewing feass” at the victim, Defendant A expressed the victim’s head one time at the victim’s hand, who is a dangerous object, and was in possession of the victim’s head one time with the above LMet.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous articles and put the victim into a critical head of the treatment days.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, and at the place described in paragraph (1), the victim A (year 52) saw the Defendant as described in paragraph (1) 1, when the Victim A (year 52) was satisfed one time to be satisfed by the victim, and the victim was satisfyed with the satisfet, which is a dangerous object in his possession, and when the victim’s head

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous articles and put the victim into a critical head of the treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, written statements and photographs (Nos. 5 through 8);

1. The Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of inflicting an injury by using dangerous articles);

1. Defendants subject to discretionary mitigation: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (i.e., confession, agreement, and fact that the Defendants do not suffer from injury);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary mitigation);