제명의결처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. From around 192, the Plaintiff has been engaged in construction business in running C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”), D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”), and F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”).
On November 26, 2014, the contract amount of the construction project owner at the name of the representative of the company (spouse) on November 26, 2014, G (spouse) C on November 26, 2014, 33,030,000, G (spouse) C (spouse) on November 26, 2014, 1,211,387,000, 000, 30, 34,325,000, 000, 300, 15, 60, 60, 160, 165, 30, 70, 15, 30, 200, 300, 34,325,000, 000, 300, 360, 165, 60, 165, 60, 165, 206, 360, 615, 65, 65, 60, 30, 1,
B. On June 4, 2014, the Plaintiff won the Defendant’s member at the 6th nationwide local election, which was implemented on June 4, 2014, and even thereafter C/D entered into a negotiated contract with B as follows (hereinafter “instant negotiated contract”, and individual negotiated contract is referred to as “0 free contract”).
On January 27, 2016, Defendant Ywon et al. violated Article 33(2) of the Act on Contracts to Which a Local Government Is a Party (hereinafter “Local Contract Act”) with respect to the instant negotiated contract, and thereby, the Plaintiff demanded disciplinary action (hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”).
E. The Defendant referred the instant request for disciplinary action to the Special Committee on Ethics, and the Special Committee on Ethics recognized the grounds for disciplinary action on June 14, 2016 and the Defendant.