2. The crime of this case, which encourages the general public to commit an excessive speculative spirit, requires strict punishment, and in light of the circumstances and contents leading to the crime of this case revealed in the records and pleadings, and the method of committing the crime of this case, the crime of this case is highly poor, and the defendant already was sentenced to criminal punishment on October 1, 2007, and repeated the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime after being released from prison for three and a half years and six months due to special robbery on October 1, 2007. In particular, the crime of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of the court below 2014Da1921, which was first controlled by the investigation agency for a long time, was committed closely and systematically with other accomplices during that period, and the court below committed a speculative act of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of which the court below's wrong with his wrong and its wrong, etc.

3. If so, the defendant and the prosecutor's appeal against the judgment of the court below are without merit. Thus, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.