Based on its stated reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the charged facts of this case on the grounds that there was no proof of crime.

The judgment below

In light of the records, the above judgment of the court below is just, and there is no error in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the infringement of trademark rights (service marks) as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.