However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) sent to the site after receiving 112 reports while drunkly coming at the Dong B 101 parking lot, Ansan-si, Ansan-si on May 20, 2015; and (b) received a request from the Defendant’s wife to explain the emergency measures, etc. for domestic violence crimes in relation to the prevention of domestic violence from Annsan-si, Ansan-si, Seoul Police Station, which was requested by the Defendant’s wife, and obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate execution of duties against the report and the crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A copy of the work log;

1. Certificate of employment;

1. Application of B CCTV image Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1 year and April) (6-1 year) (no person who has been specially punished): / The normal circumstances favorable to the decision of a sentence / the decision of a sentence : the fact that there is no criminal record for the same kind of crime: The fact that the nature of the crime is bad: The defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, the circumstances of the crime in this case