2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

A. The plaintiff's assertion was operated by medical center while operating the agency business of non-party C, Inc. (hereinafter "D"). On May 207, the plaintiff died, and the non-party E claimed a title trust and seized the shares of D, and the defendant took part in the above Eul's tort.

In the process, the defendant, in collaboration with E, caused the plaintiff deprived of the right to operate the agency in order to relieve his/her infringement on the plaintiff's right to claim compensation for damages by inducing the plaintiff to live together with E, filing a complaint or accusation against the plaintiff.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff's agency's right of business and damages for delay as part of the damages arising from the plaintiff's agency's infringement and failure in hospital operation, and 4 million won in total, and 4.5 million won in mental damages arising from infringement of the right of claim for remedy for damages and damages for delay.

B. 1) Determination 1: (a) In full view of all the evidence presented by the Plaintiff’s submission, it is insufficient to find that, even if the Defendant took part in the process of taking the Plaintiff’s D shares, the Plaintiff’s death was taken by unlawful means, or the Defendant took part in the process of taking the Plaintiff’s shares; and (b) there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s assertion that, on the premise of this, the Defendant’s tort, thereby infringing the Plaintiff’s agency’s business, or that the Plaintiff infringed the Plaintiff’s right to take part in the medical business, is without merit. Rather, in full view of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 12, the wife Nonparty F and

The Defendant of E and D as the Incheon District Court 2012Gahap8648, and C transferred 6,000 shares of D to E on February 6, 2006, and C at the time was in the state of having no capacity to perform a legal act, so the said share transfer contract is deemed null and void, and in the future of F etc.