However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 24, 2017, around 18:30 on March 24, 2017, the Defendant, “C” operated by the Defendant, was in dispute with the operation of the victim D (45 Does) and the cream, and the packaging horse operated by the said victim. The Defendant, as a hand, she spawned the victim’s breath with breath, boomed the victim’s breath, or divided the face into strong or face face, and she spawned the victim’s breath with 10 times the victim’s breath, thereby impairing the victim’s breath and spathing the victim that requires treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (Submission of a written diagnosis of the victim's DNA injury, and attaching images and caps photographs to the victim at the time of violence taken by Handphones of the victim);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act - The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution - Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant recognizes the crime and has no criminal records of imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment;