When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 5, 2018, the Defendant reported 112 within 20:15, Seosan-si B, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, west C, and called up, the Defendant: (a) whether the Defendant “ does not properly handle the instant case”; (b) whether the Defendant’s police box affiliated with the police box called up;

S. S. S. S. S. police officer:

“The police officer was expressed as “,” and on the ground of a minor’s illness, the police officer took two times every year.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's performance of official duties related to the 112 report on handling of the case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Place of work;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling List;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not good in light of the form of the instant crime for sentencing, but there is no serious criminal record except for the Defendant’s admission of the crime and the mistake. There is no serious criminal record other than the punishment once a fine for another type of crime, the police officer’s age, sexual conduct, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and other factors of sentencing as indicated in the instant records and arguments, including the circumstances after the crime, shall be comprehensively considered, and the sentence is determined as ordered.