국가유공자 및 보훈보상대상자 요건 비해당 결정 처분취소
1. The part concerning the heat from the internal side of the judgment in the first instance shall be revoked, and the revoked part shall be applicable thereto;
1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: " March 3, 2014" in Part 2, Part 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be " March 4, 2014," and Part 1 of the same face-to-face 1 shall be " July 27, 2016," and Part 4, 3, 4, 4, 3, 5, 5, 6, 7, 7, 9, 6, 7, and 9, 4, 5, 7, 7, and 9, 7, and 9, as stated in the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for deletion of not more than 9, 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
F. 5) In full view of the record of evidence as seen earlier, and the fact-finding results, the court of first instance dismissed the Plaintiff’s above application on the ground that: (a) on March 3, 2014, the Plaintiff described the difference at the time of applying for the registration of the instant persons of distinguished service to the State only “kneeee” and did not state the specific name; (b) on the above application, the Defendant did not state the fact-finding’s decision on knee, “Seeeeeeeeeum skne sne sne sne sne sne sne se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se-se se se se se-se se se se se se se se-se se se se se se se se se se se se.se se se se.se se.se se se se se se.).