A. The Defendant Incorporated Foundation A’s KRW 497,382,273 and its relation thereto shall be annually from January 11, 2013 to April 29, 2016.

A. The Plaintiff concluded each delegation agreement with the Defendant Foundation through C, an affiliated attorney-at-law, as indicated below.

Defendant B, the representative of the Defendant Foundation, has jointly and severally guaranteed the Defendant Foundation’s remuneration payment obligation under the agreement.

The Seoul Central District Court Decision 2006Gu7859 decided Oct. 14, 2010, which rendered a decision of compulsory mediation on Oct. 26, 2010, as a result of the lawsuit seeking acceptance of the case agreement (the first case) and the objection against the case of the amount of money received (the case of Gohap 25284, 201) at the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2006Da7859 decided Oct. 14, 2010, which was concluded on Oct. 21, 2011, which was related to the case (the case of 2012Gahap 25284, 201) and the Seoul Central District Court Decision 30Da36759 decided Oct. 31, 2012 (the case of 3rd case) decided Oct. 2015, 2015 (the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2015Da13814, Mar. 11, 20191).

B. The Plaintiff designated C as the attorney in charge, and each accepted case was concluded as indicated below in the “litigation result” column.

C. As to each of the above cases, each of the same acceptance agreements was formulated in the same form.

Each of the above delegation agreements includes a contingent fee clause in Article 5, while the 1 and 2 agreements include the specific contents as described below in the same text, while in the case of the 3 through 5 agreements, the specific amount of the agreement is public letter.

Article 5 (Assistance Remuneration) (1) When the delegated affairs have successfully entered in the common agreement of Articles 1 through 5, the contingent remuneration shall be paid immediately according to the following classification:

Article 5 of the 1 Agreement

1. The amount recognized by the first instance court as a result of the judgment of the appellate court (referring to the case No. 1) and the appellate court.