Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

At around 01:23, May 2, 2020, the Defendant: (a) stated the personal information from the horse E (the age of 39) belonging to the Jeju East Police Station D District, which called “Nebibib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib,” and requested to return home; (b) expressed the desire to “frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib frib fri fri

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant in this court;

1. Statement of statement E prepared by the police officer;

1. Each investigation report (including attachment of related images / Work logs for victimized Police Officers, public official identification cards, etc.) on police preparation and images (including accompanying documents);

1. Entry of a report processing list of 112 reported cases prepared by the police;

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statute of the related photograph;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. 【The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order 【The scope of the applicable sentences under the law】 A fine of KRW 50,000 to KRW 10 million 【The sentence of a sentence of a fine of KRW 4 million : The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for two years and six months from the Suwon District Court on February 8, 2019 due to the crime of indecent act by compulsion by force on June 21, 2019 and sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on June 21, 2019, and committed the instant crime without being informed of the fact that the above judgment became final and conclusive and conclusive on June 21, 2019, and assault against police officers is deemed to be a justifiable challenge against the State’s public authority; the Defendant directly exercises a tangible force on the body of the victimized police officer; and the Defendant’s favorable circumstances in favor of the Defendant’s failure to receive from the