However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 01:00 on November 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) opened the entrance door of 2018 room; (b) intruded into the entrance door; and (c) opened one 1,000,000 won of the market price owned by the victim E, and stolen it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A statement of F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each investigation report;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and community service order [the decision of types] thief [the case of larceny in general property]: In a case of intrusion theft [the case of a person who has been specially punished] on general property other than indoor residential space (type 4): In a case of intrusion upon a place other than indoor residential space (the decision of the recommended area] no penalty [the scope of the recommendation area] April-1 year and six months [the amount of general punishment]: serious reflective provisions [the scope of punishment] statutory punishment under Article 30 of the Criminal Act: One to ten years of choice of imprisonment: Whether the punishment is statutory aggravated or mitigated: One month-10 years of imprisonment [the scope of statutory aggravated or reduced punishment] : positive and negative reasons for writing - General witness: positive and serious reflect [the period of punishment and recommendation] : The defendant's age limit is determined by comparing the defendant's punishment with the defendant's motive for committing the crime in this case; his personal character and behavior and the result of his recommendation in this case];

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.