However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On October 1, 2019, the Defendant, at around 02:20 on October 1, 2019, 202: (a) under the influence of alcohol to the victim D (the age of 18) prior to the Gyeonggi-si B Public Notice Center, she saw the victim to “drasing young son because she is suffering from a wall” without any particular reason; (b) assaulted the victim by putting the body part of his/her hand against himself/herself, with the wall.

2. On October 1, 2019, at around 10:48, the Defendant, while drunkd at the place indicated in the above “1.1.” and without any justifiable reason, expressed the victim’s desire to “satisfing so that he did so, she would have satisf ..............” The Defendant breadd the victim’s bat with her hand, and assaulted the victim by pushing the bat. On October 26, 2019, the Defendant 22:05, under the influence of alcohol at the place indicated in the above “1........., the Defendant bnded,” the Defendant breathdd the victim by breathing the victim’s body and boomed twice with the wall.

Summary of Evidence

Witness

E Application of the police statement law to E’s legal statement D

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that even though the defendant had a history of being punished for a crime related to violence, he/she has committed the same kind of crime repeatedly, and did not reach an agreement with the victim, the degree of

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;