업무상횡령
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is the head of the administrative office of the middle and high school.
The defendant was the head of the administrative office of a school in charge of the purchase of food materials and related disbursement affairs.
B Pre October 2013, middle and high schools purchased food for school meals through several contracts. Among them, some agricultural products, such as trend, studio, and glutinous rice, were directly purchased from C military residents to promote the regional economy and purchased food materials by means of preparing a written resolution for expenditure with a simplified receipt.
1. The Defendant, among the food materials and food items, used easy to handle the accounting of the goods using simplified receipts, and used public funds to deduct public funds under the pretext of purchasing food materials, thereby raising funds and living expenses necessary for school operation.
Around September 201, the Defendant ordered B High School dietitian E to prepare a written disbursement item, as if he was supplied with a strings, even though he was not supplied with the actual strings, at the B High School administrative office around the end of 2011. The Defendant prepared a written disbursement item of KRW 8,500,000,000 to October 13, 201, and then the head of the administrative division prepared a written disbursement decision by October 13, 201 with the approval of the principal of the school who was approved in the document and received KRW 8,50,000,000 from 4 times in total, such as the list of crimes (1) again, and embezzled a considerable amount for personal use by receiving KRW 5,509,000 from 50,000 for the personal account in total.
2. The Defendant prepared an expenditure resolution to purchase a studio more than the actual purchase trend through G that has long supplied 1st century with B high school for a long time and tried to receive the difference back.
In February 2012, the Defendant stated that school dietitian E needs to be built and added for 200 hours even though he/she was supplied with 100 actual trends at a high school administrative office around the end of February 2012.