However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 19, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Sungnam Support, and was sentenced to a fine of four million won for the same crime in the same court on June 12, 2012.

On March 7, 2015, at around 19:05, the Defendant driven a Poter C vehicle owned by the Defendant with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.164% under the influence of alcohol at approximately 4km from the 4km to the street of about 151 in the same city, starting from the Posiwon in Namyang-si, Namyang-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on detection of drinking drivers and the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. The circumstantial report of an employee;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports and investigation reports (reports on previous records and attachment of the same type of judgment);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., that the defendant repents and reflects his/her misconduct and that he/she has no criminal record of suspended execution or more);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);

1. To impose an order to attend a compliance driving lecture to prevent recidivism, taking into consideration the fact that he/she again drives under drinking, even though he/she had a record of punishment for drinking driving, such as the previous conviction on the defendant, although he/she had a record of driving under influence, etc.;