However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 21, 2016, at around 00:05, the Defendant, at around 00:05, sent a report of 112, stating that “A female scambs around the road by a female scamb on the camb in the middle-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was asked for returning home from the police slope E, the police officer’s slope, and the police officer’s slope belonging to the Seoul mid-gu Police Station D (Scamb), who called “this scam, redevelopment should be at issue,” and tried to assault a slope E by drinking from the cambs, and the Defendant was scamd with the f face of the cambscambs.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reporting duties and the protection of prisoners.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (from June to one year and four months) (the person subject to special sentencing) [decision of sentence] of the basic area (from June to one year and four months), and the defendant's living relationship, criminal record relation, etc. shall be determined as per the disposition, taking into account the following factors.