When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant and the victim B(n, 47 years old) are couples who are currently in a divorce lawsuit.

At around 01:30 on May 10, 2020, the Defendant, at the defendant's house located in C apartment house D around March 10, 2020, had the victim go beyond the floor by getting the victim to take a truck with one ton of freight in the victim's name, and to find the key of the vehicle, the Defendant saw the Defendant, who kiddds with the victim, who was a food tabler in the living room, and kid with the victim to stop it by hand, and kid the kid with the kids, and caused the victim to go beyond the floor, such as getting the victim to go against the wall and the cell floor.

As a result, the defendant suffered from the victim's stuffed part of the following arms and other unclear parts that need to be treated for about 2 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Protocols made by some police statements concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of subparagraph (B) of a field photograph or an injury diagnosis report;

1. Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 266 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is recognized; (b) the primary offender who has no record of criminal punishment; and (c) the fact that the victim’s injury is relatively heavy; and (d) the punishment is determined as ordered in light of the Defendant’s age, sex, family environment, motive, means and consequence; and (c) the circumstances after committing the crime.