However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Defendant

B A is a person who supplies meat to the “F E” located in Gwangjin-gu, Seoul operated by the victim D, and Defendant A is a person who has been an employee in the above Mat’s Mat’s Mat’s Mat’s Mat.

In order to resist the victim's failure to pay the price for the supply of the meat to Defendant B, the Defendants found the same Mat, first, Defendant B conspiredd with the victim in writing, with objects that could put a threat, such as a knife, at the outside of the case where Defendant B had talked with the victim and it was not well-known.

1. At around 11:40 on October 15, 2013, the Defendants’ joint criminal conduct, Defendant B called “the Defendant, with the victim D and the payment issue,” Defendant B called “the Defendant, with the victim’s phone called to the victim A and the Defendant.”

Defendant A, who received the above telephone, took an attitude of 2 knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif

As a result, the Defendants conspired, while carrying 2 knife knife knife, which is a dangerous object, threatened the victim.

2. Defendant A, at the time and place set forth in paragraph (1), destroyed a computer monitor for calculating the market price, which was the victim’s ownership in the Mart Calculation Zone, by selling it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Partial statements of each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the investigation report (on-site CCTV).