2. The judgment of the defendant is favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and is against the defendant, that the defendant agreed to the defendant smoothly with the victim, and that the victim wanted to have the defendant's wife, etc.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant’s negligence, which caused the victim to suffer bodily injury requiring medical treatment of about 16 weeks at the center line; (b) the nature of the crime was not weak; and (c) the Defendant was charged with the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents by causing traffic accidents even around 2013; and (d) the Defendant was subject to a non-prosecution disposition that is not authorized due to the purchase of comprehensive insurance; (b) the sentencing equality with the cases of the same and similar kinds of cases; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime were committed; and (d) the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable; and (e) the Defendant and its defense counsel’s allegation about the above

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.