A. The grounds for the attachment of the claim(However, the "creditor" is considered as the "Plaintiff" and the "debtor" as the "Defendant". In addition, the plaintiff transferred the claim of this case to the succeeding intervenor on June 1, 2017, and notified the defendant thereof) and each of the written statements are as follows.

[Ground of recognition] The items of Gap's evidence 1 to 5, Gap's evidence 1 to 8, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. As to the Defendant’s assertion 1), the Defendant merely provided a joint and several surety of KRW 1.7 billion among the total 1.7 billion loans from the Plaintiff, and provided five parcels of land owned by the Defendant as a physical collateral to the Plaintiff, which did not cause any damage to the Defendant’s other property. However, according to the above evidence, the Defendant asserted that the Defendant cannot accept the Plaintiff’s claim since the Defendant repaid the Plaintiff of KRW 450 million exceeding the guarantee limit. However, according to the above evidence, the Defendant provided a collateral guarantee within the limit of KRW 1.3 billion with respect to the loans of KRW 1.7 billion and the amount of KRW 91 billion with respect to the loans of KRW 1.7 billion, and the fact that the Defendant provided a collateral guarantee within the limit of KRW 9.1 billion with respect to the loans of KRW 1.7 billion, and the fact that the loans still remains within the limit of KRW 808,928,132 with respect to the simplified rehabilitation procedures of the Plaintiff. The evidence submitted by the Defendant alone is insufficient to accept.

2. Accordingly, the defendant is obligated to pay the money stated in Paragraph (1) of this Article to the plaintiff successor intervenor.