beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.06.30 2016고단444

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 8, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of 0.075% of alcohol in the middle of the blood alcohol level at approximately 6 km in front of the Seoyang-dong High Police Station, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-dong, Seoyang-gu, Seoul, about 02:30 on the same day from the non-cafeteria of the trade name located in the main city of the Sinyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoul at around 02:0 on January 8, 2016.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving of Lone Star in Ireland.

On January 8, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle under the influence of alcohol, as stated in the foregoing paragraph 1 above, while driving the vehicle at a speed of alcohol, and driven the road of six lanes in front of the D in Gyeyang-gu, Soyang-gu, Seoyangyang-gu, Seoul at a speed of an insular speed along three lanes from the mountain to the speed of search.

At this point, the passage of a vehicle is high through a long-distance intersection, so a person engaged in driving of a vehicle has a duty of care to maintain the safety distance with the preceding vehicle by properly manipulating the steering and brakes and prevent the accident by properly manipulating the steering and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive the vehicle while driving the vehicle on the front side of the Defendant, and was driven by the victim E (47 tax) who was driven by the victim E (47) while driving the vehicle on the front side of the Defendant, led the Defendant to receive the front part of the vehicle in the givenland, and due to the shock, the Defendant got the front part of the vehicle in question while driving the said vehicle on the front part of the victim G (54 tax) with the front part of the vehicle in the given vehicle. In addition, the Defendant, by going through the front part of the said taxi, led the victim I (64 tax) to successively conflict with the rear part of the said taxi.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim E, such as salt, tension, etc., of the chills that require approximately three weeks of medical treatment.