However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 20:42 on July 11, 2015, the Defendant was driving a BYFystol car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.214% at the section of approximately 900 meters from the front of the Dongcheon Residents' Center located in the Docheon-gu, Daegu Northern-dong to the front road of the same Docheon Apartment apartment located in the same Eup/Myeon.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a BYF rocketing car.

On July 11, 2015, the Defendant had the front road of the wooden apartment located in the Eup/Myeon of the Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, proceeding from the Gu Fisheries Library to lurlluol Hospital on the side of the Gu Fisheries Library.

There are three-distance crossings without signal lights. At the front of the road, DMW car driven by the victim C(29 years of age) was driven by the victim C, so in such a case, the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to secure safety distance, properly look at the right and right of the front and right of the road, and accurately operate the steering and operating the steering system.

Nevertheless, as above, the Defendant found that the above victim was temporarily stopped due to negligence while neglecting the operation of the front time zone and the operation of the operation system while under the influence of alcohol, and found that the above victim was immediately stopped, and that the part behind the above BMW car was the front part of the car driven by the Defendant, and due to the shock, the above BMW car was pushed forward in the future, and the victim E (I, 40 years old) who was under the influence of the vehicle driven by the victim E (I, the 40 years old) who was under the influence of the above BMW car was under the front part of the BMW car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence to the victim C the brain-dead sugar requiring treatment for up to 20 days, injury without any open address in the two parts, and the victim E suffered from the throstosis in detail requiring treatment for about 20 days, and injury without any open address in the two parts.