However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On October 16, 2014, the Defendant was required to verify his status on the street in front of the “D” located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Jongno-gu, Seoul, and on the ground that he avoided the disturbance from the AssistantF affiliated with the Sejong Police Station E Police Station.

In order to maintain the status of the Defendant, the Defendant, as a case interfering with auction, presented in advance the Defendant’s driver’s license to the Defendant, and exercised the driver’s license issued by the Seoul Provincial Police Agency, which is an official document, for the purpose of deceiving the Defendant’s status.

2. Forgery of private signature, and the use of a false investigation or signature;

A. On October 16, 2014, at around 16:25, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender on the ground that the disturbance was avoided, and forged a letter of confirmation on the arrest of a flagrant offender and submitted it to a slopeF to use it.

B. On October 16, 2014, around 18:35, the Defendant was investigating the disturbance as the case at the criminal office and office of the Seoul Jongno Police Station located in Jongno-gu Seoul, and was working as the Defendant’s model G.

After completion of the investigation, the Defendant, without authority, stated “G” in the front statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol without authority, forged the signature, and submitted it to H during the investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Statement of police seizure;

1. Letters of arrest of flagrant offenders, written confirmation, protocol of the police examination of the accused, articles seized and photographed;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (related to identification card);

1. Articles 230, 239 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In the case of unlawful uttering of official documents among the above crimes on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the crime constitutes imprisonment with prison labor for not less than four months nor more than ten months, and a signature, forgery, and forgery.