A. In addition to the purport of the entire pleadings in the written evidence Nos. 1 and 2 evidence, the Plaintiff set the interest rate of KRW 60 million to the Defendant on May 29, 2011 at 24% (the Plaintiff appears to have leased KRW 60 million to the Defendant on May 29, 2011, with interest rate of KRW 24% per annum (the Plaintiff’s interest rate of KRW 2.5% per annum as asserted by the Plaintiff shall be agreed interest rate of KRW 24% per annum) and the Defendant lent to the Plaintiff by setting the amount of KRW 10 million per six months, and the Defendant paid interest to the Plaintiff by June 15, 2013.

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 60 million won with the interest rate of 24% per annum from June 16, 2013 to the day of full payment.

B. As to this, the Defendant asserted that the payment of interest other than the payment of interest by June 15, 2013 has been made, but it is difficult to find any evidence to acknowledge this.

(B) In addition, the Defendant asserted that: (a) around July 2014, the Plaintiff agreed to deduct KRW 20 million from the principal in return for the transfer to the Plaintiff of an official business ordered by the Hanam-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gun; and (b) to pay KRW 40 million to the principal without interest. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the agreement.

Therefore, all of the defendant's arguments are without merit.

2. It is so decided as per Disposition by admitting the plaintiff's claim on the ground that it is reasonable.