When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who operates an entertainment drinking house under the trade name of “D” in the field of debate.

The owner of a business establishment harmful to juveniles shall not employ a juvenile, and the owner of a business establishment harmful to juveniles shall verify the age of the juvenile in advance when he/she intends to employ the employee.

Nevertheless, around 22:40 on May 13, 2015, the Defendant employed E (n, 16 years of age) as a juvenile at 30,000 won per hour.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. An interrogation protocol of the accused and F by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Article 58 of the relevant Act on Criminal facts, subparagraph 4 of Article 58 of the Act on the Protection of Youth from which a punishment is selected, Article 29 (1) of the same Act

2. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse is that the defendant is committed and led to the crime in this case, and the defendant sent E to E without confirming the age, etc. even though he was sent to E, who is not a juvenile, even though he was sent to E in a usual F, and even though he was sent to E not a juvenile, the defendant sent it to E. The defendant sent to E without confirming the age, etc. of his age. Since E was repaired at the time of his entertainment drinking house, the defendant allowed E to provide entertainment without confirming his identification card, etc. during his absence of mind and caused the crime in this case by taking into account the motive and circumstance, and other various circumstances shown in the argument in this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior