2. The Defendant’s recognition of all of the instant crimes is against the Defendant, and the amount of damage is less than the amount and the agreement with the victim is favorable to the Defendant.

On the other hand, although the defendant had been punished twice for the same crime, he/she committed the crime of this case again during the period of repeated crime, etc. that is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In addition, taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, circumstances leading up to and motive of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s sentence which sentenced the lowest sentence within the scope of the punishment mitigated by discretionary mitigation of one year, cannot be deemed as being too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.