대여금
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. The parties' assertion and judgment
A. The summary of the parties' assertion 1) The plaintiff Eul found the plaintiff's office located in Busan Dongdong-gu, Busan on May 2007, and the plaintiff "the collateral security is established, but the actual value of which is KRW 150 million, and the provisional seizure is made in the name of KRW 130 million. The plaintiff recommended to the purport that "the plaintiff will release the provisional seizure of KRW 10 million and transfer it to the defendant Eul's deposit account as requested by the defendant Eul." Accordingly, the plaintiff loaned KRW 10 million to the defendant as the provisional seizure of KRW 10 million, and the plaintiff is jointly and severally liable for the above KRW 10 million with the defendant Eul's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's KRW 10 million to the defendant Eul's loan's loan's above.
At the time, Defendant B was engaged in the repair business of the vessel under the name of Defendant C’s business operator, but the vessel was provisionally seized in C’s name on the ground that Defendant B did not receive KRW 240 million of the repair cost claim for the vessel owned by Russia (E).
The plaintiff, knowing that he would purchase the above vessel, remitted the above amount of KRW 10 million to Defendant C’s deposit account, and contact the above amount with Defendant C’s East F to the cost of attorney appointment and ship auction procedure.