교인 지위 부존재 확인 등
1. The plaintiffs' lawsuits against the defendant Cho Jae-won's Jindivities Association of Korea (representative C) and the plaintiff Jindivities Association of Korea.
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff church is a church established by K around October 1975 and is a church belonging to the Plaintiff’s local church. Since around 2003, there is a conflict between the members supporting K (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s members”) from around 2003 to the Defendant, etc. (hereinafter “Defendant’s members”), including the Defendant C, who are non-Confidence in the N of K and the successor wood company, and there is still a conflict between the members of the Plaintiff church and the members including the Defendant C, etc. (hereinafter “Defendant’s members”).
B. The Plaintiff church uses the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul L ground church (hereinafter “the instant building”) as a building for worshiping, etc. From the time the conflict occurs as above, the Plaintiff’s members are using the second floor of the instant building, and the Defendant’s members are using the first floor and underground parts of the instant building for their worship activities, etc. In addition, the Plaintiff’s members and the Defendant’s members separately issue the main bulletin with the name of “O” and engage in worship activities.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's statements as to Gap's 4 through 8, 11, 18 through 20, 27, 29, 31, 33, 34, 47 (including branch numbers for those with additional numbers), Eul's statements as to Gap's 1 through 11, 18 through 20, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination on the legitimacy of a lawsuit
A. Under the premise that Defendant C et al. withdrawn from the Plaintiff church and newly established the Defendant church, which is a new church, the Plaintiffs seek confirmation that the Defendant church is not a branch church belonging to the Plaintiff community.
glocks, the following 3
B. 1) As seen in paragraph (1), insofar as it is difficult to view Defendant C, etc. newly established the Defendant church, it cannot be said that the Defendant church still exists as a non-corporate body with the capacity of a party separate from the Plaintiff church, and thus, the Plaintiffs’ lawsuit against the Defendant church is unlawful as it is against an organization with the capacity of a party. B. Determination on this safety defense 1).