도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On November 19, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of 3.5 million won by the Daegu District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On April 2, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of 2.5 million won by the same court on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).
【Criminal Facts】
1. On May 17, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at around 0.194% in blood alcohol concentration without obtaining a driver’s license on May 21, 2015, the Defendant driven a vehicle of approximately 2 km BM3 vehicle from the apartment parking lot of the New Cancer-dong 1 Complex in Daegu-gu New Cancer-dong, a city of approximately 0.194% in front of the central high school located in Daegu-gu Suwon-dong, a city of approximately 2 km from the apartment parking lot to the road in front of the central high school located in Daegu-gu Suwon-dong.
2. The Defendant is a person engaged in driving a vehicle BM3 vehicle.
On May 17, 2015, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol of 0.194% without obtaining a driver’s license on May 17, 2015, and proceeded at the speed of about 50 km per hour from the surface of the claim neons distance to the road in front of the new market located in the Daegu Lane-gu 194.
Since there was an intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to safely operate the steering system by checking the safety of the course by checking well the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was negligent in finding a DNF Engine cab driven by the victim C while stopping according to the vehicle stop signal and was negligent in not operating the brake system accurately, received the back panion part of the said cab as the front part of the said car.
Ultimately, the Defendant owned the victim by occupational negligence as above.